A) Start with the main page. Does it have any cleanup banners that have been placed there to indicate problems with the article?
1.This article or section has multiple issues. No.
2.This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No.
3.The neutrality of this article is disputed. No.
4.The factual accuracy of this article is disputed. No.
5.This needs copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling. No.
6.This may contain material not appropriate for an encyclopedia. No.
7.This article only describes one highly specialized aspect of its associated subject. No.
8.This article requires authentication or verification by an expert. No.
9.This article or section needs to be updated. No.
10.This article may not provide balanced geographical coverage on a region. No.
11.This is missing citations or needs footnotes. No.
12.This article does not cite any references or sources. No.
B) Read through the article and see if it meets the following requirements:
13.Is it written in a clear and organized way? Yes
14.Is the tone neutral (not taking sides)? The tone of the article does not take sides; however, the article is about an argument and is describing one side of it. However, it is all about the facts and ideas of that side of the argument, not if that side is correct or not.
15.Are all important facts referenced (you're told where they come from)? Yes. There is documented evidence and other linked sources to show where the information came from.
16.Does the information provided seem complete or does it look like there are gaps (or just one side of the story)? The information is complete. It is just one side of the argument, but it references the other side so you know that the other side of the argument exists and you can follow links to go research it.
No comments:
Post a Comment